Impact of French elections on the Middle East by Damien Bruckard

Damien Bruckard 

CEO of Geopolitical Strategy and former diplomat


The recent French legislative elections may have left a shock in the media, but there will be almost no discernible impact on French foreign policy, including towards the Middle East. In France, foreign policy powers vest in the President with the National Assembly having very little influence over its direction.

For this reason, even during traditional "cohabitation" periods in French politics -- where the President comes from one party and the government, formed in government -- comes from another, the composition of parliament has almost no impact on France's international posture. While the socialist left coalition and the far-right parties both did well in the elections -- each with roughly a third of seats, with centrists also receiving about a third -- the fact that the parliament is divided will mean that members will have even less influence over foreign policy than usual.

Furthermore, we are unlikely to see a stable government coalesce in France for at least several months. More likely, there will be a transition period before a technocratic government, perhaps led by the liberal Republicans, will be appointed. And when that happens, a technocratic government will implement the will of the President, not wanting to rock the boat. Where the new political complexion of the parliament could have some impact is on migration policy. The far-right had been calling for strict restrictions on migration and clamping down on crime. Had they won an outright majority, there could be some changes. But given that the result was a hung parliament and there will likely be a technocratic one appointed in months to come, France will not radically change its posture on migration.


In the longer-term, however, the political gridlock likely to ensue will mean that migration challenges -- perceived as a major problem on the far-right and by much of the population -- will continue to mount, possibly aiding the political fortunes of Marine Le Pen as she prepares to run for President in three years' time. Overall, then, France's elections are unlikely to have any impact on foreign policy nor on migration but they will shape political views among the people which could lead to greater polarisation and therefore higher chances of a far-right President coming into power. And that, in at least three years time, is the only factor that could significantly alter France's relations with the Middle East, migration policy and broader foreign policy approach -- including to Ukraine and the European Union. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iran, USA, Israel — A Complex Trio? Lessons from History and Future Prospects by Richa Bhattarai

Image
Richa Bhattarai  Expert in International Conflict Management In the media today, the dominant narrative revolves around the hostile and contentious relationships of Iran with both Israel and the United States, while the United States and Israel maintain strategic alliances. However, what often goes unnoticed is the shared interests between Iran and both the United States and Israel not only during the Shah's regime but also under the post-revolutionary Islamic regime. The complexities of this trio can be simplified if we focus on mutual interests rather than conflicting attitudes. Setting aside the contentious issue of Israel's existence, especially in light of events post-October 7, 2024, it becomes crucial to examine whether the Iran-Israel relationship is inherently adversarial. The answer is mixed and largely depends on who is leading the government in Iran. Historical evidence indicates that during the Shah's regime, Iran and Israel had a relationship characterized by
Read more

Will superpowers play a role in escalating tensions in the Middle East? By Lorenzo Trombetta

Image
 Source: Elcano Royal Institute Lorenzo Trombetta Senior Middle Eastern Correspondent Senior MidSenior Middle Eastern Correspondentdle Eastern Correspondent Nowadays, especially after October 7, the entire Middle Eastern region is almost unanimously depicted as a battlefield marked by various trenches of attrition wars, poised to trigger a final and devastating sequence toward a total and large-scale conflict. Behind this image, often evoked in both Middle Eastern and Western public debates by local political elites and diplomatic circles, lies a more nuanced and complex reality. This reality consists of a series of tacit and unwritten agreements between rival actors, based on a convergence of strategic and long-lasting interests: the maintenance of power within a political status quo. This status quo, which appears to have been challenged by the unprecedented Hamas operation on October 7, 2023, won’t be easily or radically altered because none of the local, regional, or international
Read more

What role does Qatar play in mediating conflicts in the Middle East? by Ariel Admoni

Image
  Source: The Jerusalem Post Ariel Admoni PhD researcher at Bar-Ilan University and Middle East commentator Qatar mediation is a crucial component of Doha's foreign policy. The mediation in various conflicts wasn't just in the Middle East but rather around the globe, even with remote states. During 2023 and the Gaza war, Qatar also mediated between Russia and Ukraine and received compliments from both sides. Even before the Gaza war, the unique international status of Qatar, as reflected in its role as a mediator, was present in its mediation between Iran and the U.S. on the one hand, and between the Taliban government in Afghanistan and the international community on the other hand. The presence of the terror organizations in Doha was the reason Qatar became a key player in the mediation between Hamas and Israel. This connection was a geo-political asset in the hands of Doha. As a way to handle the mild international pressure, Qatari authorities claimed their presence was need
Read more