Impact of Iran's elections on the Israel-Hamas war by Prof. Eric Lob

 



Professor Eric Lob

Associate Professor at Florida International University


The outcome of the Iranian election could impact the Israel-Hamas war and the chance of its expansion. At a superficial level, one could surmise that a victory for the conservative candidate, Saeed Jalili, would create a more confrontational policy toward Israel and consequently expand the conflict. According to this logic, if the reformist candidate, Masoud Pezeshkian, were to prevail then that would parlay into a more conciliatory policy and a higher probability of de-escalation. 

While these assumptions may possess some validity, they are complicated by the fact that the supreme leader has the ultimate say over foreign policy. Under his leadership, and since start of the war, Iran has walked a fine line between saving face and maintaining deterrence while avoiding a direct confrontation with the conventionally superior adversaries of Israel and the United States for the sake of regime survival. Even under the conservative president, Ebrahim Raisi, and several days before his death, Iran reportedly engaged in indirect talks with the United States in Oman to dial down regional tensions.

 While nothing is certain in such an unpredictable and volatile region, one would expect Iran’s pragmatic policy to persist as the conflict continues. Beyond Iran’s strategic calculus and its influence over regional proxies and partners, the expansion or de-escalation of the conflict will ultimately depend on the decisions and actions of the protagonists themselves. They include an Israeli government that has prioritized politics over peace and maximalism over moderation.

 An American administration that has been complicit in the conflict by enabling Israel diplomatically and militarily. A Hamas militia that refuses to relinquish its role as the principal provider of security and governance in Gaza and as the primary leader of the Palestinian nationalist movement in competition with the Palestinian Authority. And a Hezbollah militia that risks dragging Lebanon into another catastrophic conflict and deeper into crisis to champion the Palestinian cause and defend the axis of resistance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iran, USA, Israel — A Complex Trio? Lessons from History and Future Prospects by Richa Bhattarai

Image
Richa Bhattarai  Expert in International Conflict Management In the media today, the dominant narrative revolves around the hostile and contentious relationships of Iran with both Israel and the United States, while the United States and Israel maintain strategic alliances. However, what often goes unnoticed is the shared interests between Iran and both the United States and Israel not only during the Shah's regime but also under the post-revolutionary Islamic regime. The complexities of this trio can be simplified if we focus on mutual interests rather than conflicting attitudes. Setting aside the contentious issue of Israel's existence, especially in light of events post-October 7, 2024, it becomes crucial to examine whether the Iran-Israel relationship is inherently adversarial. The answer is mixed and largely depends on who is leading the government in Iran. Historical evidence indicates that during the Shah's regime, Iran and Israel had a relationship characterized by
Read more

Energy security and waterways in light of new tensions in the MENA region by Syed Shahnawaz (Simon) Mohsin

Image
  Source: Financialtribune Syed Shahnawaz (Simon) Mohsin Independent Political and International Affairs Analyst Concerns of regional conflict in MENA threaten world energy security as the possibility of attacks on regional energy infrastructure rises. The region produces about 30% of global crude oil, the vast majority produced by Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and UAE. Three major oil transits or chokepoints—the Strait of Hormuz, Bab-el Mandeb Strait, and the Suez Canal—are in this region. About 40 million barrels of fuel pass through these waterways. Some argue that markets may underestimate the geopolitical and potential energy supply disruption risks. However, nuances must be considered. Palestine and Lebanon are not major oil producers. Thus, conflicts there do not directly threaten oil supplies. Nonetheless, a prolonged conflict involving Iran could lead to a significant increase in oil prices. In early October, oil prices increased to a two-year high after the US President m
Read more

Will superpowers play a role in escalating tensions in the Middle East? By Lorenzo Trombetta

Image
 Source: Elcano Royal Institute Lorenzo Trombetta Senior Middle Eastern Correspondent Senior MidSenior Middle Eastern Correspondentdle Eastern Correspondent Nowadays, especially after October 7, the entire Middle Eastern region is almost unanimously depicted as a battlefield marked by various trenches of attrition wars, poised to trigger a final and devastating sequence toward a total and large-scale conflict. Behind this image, often evoked in both Middle Eastern and Western public debates by local political elites and diplomatic circles, lies a more nuanced and complex reality. This reality consists of a series of tacit and unwritten agreements between rival actors, based on a convergence of strategic and long-lasting interests: the maintenance of power within a political status quo. This status quo, which appears to have been challenged by the unprecedented Hamas operation on October 7, 2023, won’t be easily or radically altered because none of the local, regional, or international
Read more