The implications of the UK elections for the Middle East region by Dr. Tom Walsh






Dr. Tom Walsh 

Lecturer and Tutor of International Relations and Politics & Middle East Researcher


The New (capitalisation intentional) Labour government has been met with optimistic eyebrow raising around the world. A so-called progressive party back in charge of a G8 country, at a glance, signals hope. The new foreign secretary, David Lammy, has been spreading his message of 'progressive realism' for a while now. He defines this, and I quote, as:


"using realist means to pursue progressive ends. For the British government, that requires tough-minded honesty about the United Kingdom, the balance of power, and the state of the world. But instead of using the logic of realism solely to accumulate power, progressive realism uses it in the service of just goals — for example climate change, defending democracy, and advancing the world’s economic development. It is the pursuit of ideals without the delusions about what is achievable".


Typical of centrist policy, this view gives the Labour party almost infinite wiggle-room when it comes to its foreign affairs. They have tied themself down to very little, and any sense of coherence is largely absent.


Aside from this flamboyant rhetoric, what does this new government mean for the Middle East? Well, in relative terms, very little. The UK retains an over-inflated sense of self-importance, harking back to the colonial era, despite a hugely depleted army and an almost non-existent navy. 


However, what it does actually stand for amounts to a dystopian and misguided set of principles, policies, and alliances, that mark no significant change from those pursued by the Tories. Labour lost many votes, and 4 seats, to pro-Palestinian candidates. It stands for ongoing support for Israel, with Keir Starmer infamously saying in an LBC interview after the invasion of Gaza that the Israeli government "had the right" to continue to obstruct aid from reaching Palestinians. Keir Starmer saw his constitutency majority cut in half, mainly due to the success of pro-Palestine candidate and former colleague of Nelson Mandela, Andrew Feinstein.


Their manifesto pledged to label the IRGC in Iran as a terrorist organisation, and they have also committed to continue tactical strikes with the US on the Houthis in Yemen. Both of these policies will only further fuel instability in the region, and will embolden the so-called Axis of Resistance. 


This is coupled with continuing investment in and engagement with the Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia, who bombed the Houthis for 8 years to no discernible military affect. Labour will continue an alliance that has led to the world's worst humanitarian crisis in Yemen, with at least 377,000 people dying since 2015.


While Starmer and Lammy promise "progressive realism", we can expect to see more of the same, with a continuation of cooperation with the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. Any party pursuing these policies is the antithesis of progressive.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iran, USA, Israel — A Complex Trio? Lessons from History and Future Prospects by Richa Bhattarai

Image
Richa Bhattarai  Expert in International Conflict Management In the media today, the dominant narrative revolves around the hostile and contentious relationships of Iran with both Israel and the United States, while the United States and Israel maintain strategic alliances. However, what often goes unnoticed is the shared interests between Iran and both the United States and Israel not only during the Shah's regime but also under the post-revolutionary Islamic regime. The complexities of this trio can be simplified if we focus on mutual interests rather than conflicting attitudes. Setting aside the contentious issue of Israel's existence, especially in light of events post-October 7, 2024, it becomes crucial to examine whether the Iran-Israel relationship is inherently adversarial. The answer is mixed and largely depends on who is leading the government in Iran. Historical evidence indicates that during the Shah's regime, Iran and Israel had a relationship characterized by
Read more

Will superpowers play a role in escalating tensions in the Middle East? By Lorenzo Trombetta

Image
 Source: Elcano Royal Institute Lorenzo Trombetta Senior Middle Eastern Correspondent Senior MidSenior Middle Eastern Correspondentdle Eastern Correspondent Nowadays, especially after October 7, the entire Middle Eastern region is almost unanimously depicted as a battlefield marked by various trenches of attrition wars, poised to trigger a final and devastating sequence toward a total and large-scale conflict. Behind this image, often evoked in both Middle Eastern and Western public debates by local political elites and diplomatic circles, lies a more nuanced and complex reality. This reality consists of a series of tacit and unwritten agreements between rival actors, based on a convergence of strategic and long-lasting interests: the maintenance of power within a political status quo. This status quo, which appears to have been challenged by the unprecedented Hamas operation on October 7, 2023, won’t be easily or radically altered because none of the local, regional, or international
Read more

What role does Qatar play in mediating conflicts in the Middle East? by Ariel Admoni

Image
  Source: The Jerusalem Post Ariel Admoni PhD researcher at Bar-Ilan University and Middle East commentator Qatar mediation is a crucial component of Doha's foreign policy. The mediation in various conflicts wasn't just in the Middle East but rather around the globe, even with remote states. During 2023 and the Gaza war, Qatar also mediated between Russia and Ukraine and received compliments from both sides. Even before the Gaza war, the unique international status of Qatar, as reflected in its role as a mediator, was present in its mediation between Iran and the U.S. on the one hand, and between the Taliban government in Afghanistan and the international community on the other hand. The presence of the terror organizations in Doha was the reason Qatar became a key player in the mediation between Hamas and Israel. This connection was a geo-political asset in the hands of Doha. As a way to handle the mild international pressure, Qatari authorities claimed their presence was need
Read more