Labour Party's victory in the UK and its impact on the Palestinian cause by Ayiza Salman

 

Source: New Internationalist (Loredana Sanguiliano/Shutterstock)


Ayiza Salman
International Relations Researcher





Europe held one of its most momentous elections last week in Britain where socially progressive governance dominated the polls over the surging right-wing populism cursing the rest of Europe with its ultra-nationalistic ambitions and acute foreign policy implications for regions like the Middle East, where the Israeli genocide is entering its tenth month of brutality and the death toll of Palestinians could be reaching 186,000 civilians. 

In the UK, the center-left Labor Party, under Keir Starmer, won a landslide victory in general elections, marking the end of 14 years of disastrous Conservative rule under the Tory government. As his first announcement after holding office, Starmer declared the controversial Rwanda Policy, designed to fly asylum seekers from Britain to Rwanda, dead and buried.

More significantly, despite being a staunch supporter of Israel’s right to defend itself, Starmer has also called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza while rumors circulate of his party possibly dropping the bid to delay the decision of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in issuing arrest warrants for the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. 

However, it may be wiser to take the latter with a grain of salt since Labor owes the loss of its popular support, despite winning a majority in the parliament, to the loss of the Muslim vote over its lack of vocal condemnation of Israel’s assault on Palestinian civilians, suggesting patterns of performative hypocrisy, at best, and fruitless inaction, at worst. 

Conversely, Jeremy Corbyn’s win as an independent candidate against Labor, after decades of serving as its member and leader, in addition to Labor’s defeat in Muslim-dominated constituencies speaks of their hollow victory which has managed to change only the face of the status quo rather than bring a complete overhaul in British politics, and by extension, its foreign policy that remains complicit in Israel’s inhumane barbarity and complacent towards insurmountable Palestinian casualties. 

Finally, the rise of the far-right is also becoming equally difficult to ignore as the outspoken kingpin of Brexit, Nigel Farage, won his Reform Party a solid four-seat footing in the parliament with the simple ingredients of Islamophobia and anti-immigration rhetoric, evident in his statements otherizing the Muslim immigrants and equating them with terrorists. 

Therefore, these static political developments and a rampant xenophobia epidemic can only silence the already weakened voices in favor of the Palestinian cause. Otherwise, all will remain status quo and Gazans won’t wake up to any newer realities, just faint hopes of change propelled by boycotts, activism, and protests, spearheaded by the likes of Corbyn, independent MPs, and the British public.
 

Ayiza Salman is an undergraduate student of International Relations at the Institute of Business Management (IoBM) and a former research intern at a Karachi-based think tank, Pakistan Council on Foreign Relations (PCFR). 

The author can be reached at ayizasal@gmail.com. 








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iran, USA, Israel — A Complex Trio? Lessons from History and Future Prospects by Richa Bhattarai

Image
Richa Bhattarai  Expert in International Conflict Management In the media today, the dominant narrative revolves around the hostile and contentious relationships of Iran with both Israel and the United States, while the United States and Israel maintain strategic alliances. However, what often goes unnoticed is the shared interests between Iran and both the United States and Israel not only during the Shah's regime but also under the post-revolutionary Islamic regime. The complexities of this trio can be simplified if we focus on mutual interests rather than conflicting attitudes. Setting aside the contentious issue of Israel's existence, especially in light of events post-October 7, 2024, it becomes crucial to examine whether the Iran-Israel relationship is inherently adversarial. The answer is mixed and largely depends on who is leading the government in Iran. Historical evidence indicates that during the Shah's regime, Iran and Israel had a relationship characterized by
Read more

Will superpowers play a role in escalating tensions in the Middle East? By Lorenzo Trombetta

Image
 Source: Elcano Royal Institute Lorenzo Trombetta Senior Middle Eastern Correspondent Senior MidSenior Middle Eastern Correspondentdle Eastern Correspondent Nowadays, especially after October 7, the entire Middle Eastern region is almost unanimously depicted as a battlefield marked by various trenches of attrition wars, poised to trigger a final and devastating sequence toward a total and large-scale conflict. Behind this image, often evoked in both Middle Eastern and Western public debates by local political elites and diplomatic circles, lies a more nuanced and complex reality. This reality consists of a series of tacit and unwritten agreements between rival actors, based on a convergence of strategic and long-lasting interests: the maintenance of power within a political status quo. This status quo, which appears to have been challenged by the unprecedented Hamas operation on October 7, 2023, won’t be easily or radically altered because none of the local, regional, or international
Read more

What role does Qatar play in mediating conflicts in the Middle East? by Ariel Admoni

Image
  Source: The Jerusalem Post Ariel Admoni PhD researcher at Bar-Ilan University and Middle East commentator Qatar mediation is a crucial component of Doha's foreign policy. The mediation in various conflicts wasn't just in the Middle East but rather around the globe, even with remote states. During 2023 and the Gaza war, Qatar also mediated between Russia and Ukraine and received compliments from both sides. Even before the Gaza war, the unique international status of Qatar, as reflected in its role as a mediator, was present in its mediation between Iran and the U.S. on the one hand, and between the Taliban government in Afghanistan and the international community on the other hand. The presence of the terror organizations in Doha was the reason Qatar became a key player in the mediation between Hamas and Israel. This connection was a geo-political asset in the hands of Doha. As a way to handle the mild international pressure, Qatari authorities claimed their presence was need
Read more